FWYSO TWITTER- PIPELINE TO THE INSANE MEMBRANE IN THE BRAIN MAINFRAME

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

10,000 Lesnars vs. 1,000 bears.....

Taken from this thread on Sherdog.......


hmm..... at first I thought it has to go to the Lesnars because you figure it's 10 Lesnars to every 1 bear (some remedial math for you there).... then I saw this clip (which I think I also saw in Grizzly Man... and I can't underestimate how hilarious that movie is....)






PLUS you have to take into effect that it's in an open field.... the question is, is it like two armies running at each other? If it's that way then I think it's much harder for the Lesnars as they wouldn't be able to swarm and overwhelm individual bears 1 at a time..... no weapons for the Lesnars either obviously, I believe.... or time to set traps... it's 1000 bears and 10,000 Lesnars put in a field and BOOM go....

Even with or without that though I have to go 1000 bears.... the Lesnars would have to come up with a heck of a gameplan in order to win it. Plus a bear could kill a Lesnar with one swipe of it's paw or bite; while a Lesnar would need at the very absolute minimum 3 of it's own to kill an individual bear plus maximum effort for all involved in the killing... and no way all 3 come out unscathed.

It's just too easy for a bear to kill a Lesnar while it being so hard and draining for however many Lesnars to kill just one bear...





10 Lesnars vs. 1 bear though.... if at the same time, 4 Lesnars rush from the front and 4 from the back they COULD be able to take the bear down and have the other 2 come in looking for strategic strikes to vulnerable areas while the bear is occupied with the other 8... the Lesnars would lose at least 4 of their own though even if they won... I give them a 30% chance at victory if only 10 vs. 1.

No comments: